Abstract
This study examines how power operates within international development discourse and investigates its effects on development organizations and on individuals-donors and recipients of aid alike. It analyzes the narratives pertaining to Afghanistan that are (re)produced by five different types of development actors: a donor state, a recipient state, an international financial institution, an international organization, and a non-governmental organization. I argue that the operation of multiple, interrelated types of power has both ideational and material effects which manifestindevelopment policies, programs, and projects. I demonstrate how these types of power operate discursively through a Politics of Pity which (re)creates and perpetuates hierarchical, coconstituted relationships between and among these actors, andwhich (re)constitutes the identities and abilities of actors. © 2011 International Studies Association.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Naylor, T. (2011). Deconstructing Development: The Use of Power and Pity in the International Development Discourse. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00640.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.