Comparing a multimedia digital informed consent tool with traditional paper-based methods: Randomized controlled trial

32Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The traditional informed consent (IC) process rarely emphasizes research participants' comprehension of medicalinformation, leaving them vulnerable to unknown risks and consequences associated with procedures or studies.Objective: This paper explores how we evaluated the feasibility of a digital health tool called Virtual Multimedia InteractiveInformed Consent (VIC) for advancing the IC process and compared the results with traditional paper-based methods of IC.Methods: Using digital health and web-based coaching, we developed the VIC tool that uses multimedia and other digitalfeatures to improve the current IC process. The tool was developed on the basis of the user-centered design process and Mayer'scognitive theory of multimedia learning. This study is a randomized controlled trial that compares the feasibility of VIC withstandard paper consent to understand the impact of interactive digital consent. Participants were recruited from the WinchesterChest Clinic at Yale New Haven Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut, and healthy individuals were recruited from the communityusing fliers. In this coordinator-Assisted trial, participants were randomized to complete the IC process using VIC on the iPad orwith traditional paper consent. The study was conducted at the Winchester Chest Clinic, and the outcomes were self-Assessedthrough coordinator-Administered questionnaires.Results: A total of 50 participants were recruited in the study (VIC, n=25; paper, n=25). The participants in both groups hadhigh comprehension. VIC participants reported higher satisfaction, higher perceived ease of use, higher ability to complete theconsent independently, and shorter perceived time to complete the consent process.Conclusions: The use of dynamic, interactive audiovisual elements in VIC may improve participants' satisfaction and facilitatethe IC process. We believe that using VIC in an ongoing, real-world study rather than a hypothetical study improved the reliabilityof our findings, which demonstrates VIC's potential to improve research participants' comprehension and the overall process of IC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abujarad, F., Peduzzi, P., Mun, S., Carlson, K., Edwards, C., Dziura, J., … Chupp, G. (2021). Comparing a multimedia digital informed consent tool with traditional paper-based methods: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Formative Research, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.2196/20458

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free