Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): Subgroup analysis of the phase III OPTiM study

  • Middleton M
  • Harrington K
  • Ross M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: ITM (defined as intralymphatic local, satellite, and regional cutaneous/ subcutaneous metastases) is associated with significant morbidity; optimal therapy is poorly defined. T‐VEC is an oncolytic immunotherapy approved for melanoma treatment based on results from the phase III OPTiM trial. This retrospective analysis of OPTiM assessed T‐VEC in pts with unresectable AJCC 7 stage IIIB/C melanoma who had LR disease, including ITM, as the site of first recurrence following primary surgery. Methods: In OPTiM, pts were randomised to intralesional T‐VEC or subcutaneous recombinant GM‐CSF. All pts were treated for ≥6 months, after which treatment was continued until clinically relevant disease progression, intolerability, consent withdrawal, complete response (CR), lack of response by 1 yr, or disappearance of injectable lesions (T‐VEC arm only). Results: 109 patients (T‐VEC n=79; GM‐CSF n=30) had LR disease as the site of first recurrence (including ITM, local surgical scar, and regional lymph nodes). Most pts (63%) had ITM. Median time from primary melanoma diagnosis to first LR recurrence was 10.4 months. Time from first recurrence to randomisation into OPTiM was 6.6 months. At primary diagnosis, 45% of 109 pts had melanoma in the lower limbs, 25% in the head/neck, 15% on the trunk, and 11% upper limbs. At baseline, median age was 65 yrs, 94% had LDH ≤ULN, 76% had ECOG PS 0 and 35% had nodular melanoma. T‐VEC vs GM‐CSF led to objective response rates of 56% vs 1%, CR rates of 24% vs 0%, and durable response rates of 34% vs 0% (all p<0.002 vs GM‐CSF). Median OS was not reached with T‐VEC vs 25 months with GM‐CSF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28‐ 0.84; p=0.0088). The LR subpopulation experienced higher T‐VEC efficacy vs the entire study population (Table). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that T‐VEC may be of particular benefit in melanoma pts with LR recurrence, including ITM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Middleton, M. R., Harrington, K., Ross, M., Ohrling, K., Radcliffe, H.-S., & Collichio, F. (2019). Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): Subgroup analysis of the phase III OPTiM study. Annals of Oncology, 30, v547–v548. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz255.031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free