Russell, logicism, and the choice of logical constants

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is here argued that Russell’s Principles of Mathematics contains an intriguing idea about how to demarcate logical concepts from nonlogical ones. On this view, implication and generality emerge as the two fundamental logical concepts. Russell’s 1903 proposals for defining other logical concepts from these basic ones are examined and extended. Despite its attractiveness, the proposal is ultimately unsatisfactory because of problems about defining negation and existential quantification. © 1989 by the University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Byrd, M. (1989). Russell, logicism, and the choice of logical constants. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 30(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093635153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free