Abstract
To understand why some categorization tasks are more difficult than others, we consider five factors that may affect human performance - namely, covariance complexity, optimal accuracy level with and without internal noise, orientation of the optimal categorization rule, and class separability. We argue that covariance complexity, an information theoretic measure of complexity, is an excellent predictor of task difficulty. We present an experiment that consists of five conditions using a simulated medical decision-making task. In the task human observes view hundreds of hypothetical patient profiles and classify each profile into Disease Category A or B. Each profile is a continuous-valued, three-dimensional stimulus consisting of three vertical bars, where each bar height represents the result of a medical test. Across the five conditions, covariance complexity was systematically manipulated. Results indicate that variation in performance is largely a function of covariance complexity and partly a function of internal noise. The remaining three factors do not explain performance results. We present a challenge to categorization theorists to design models that account for human performance as predicted by covariance complexity.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Ashby, F. G., & Brainard, D. H. (2002). What makes a categorization task difficult? Perception and Psychophysics, 64(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194727
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.