Performance analysis of different tuning rules for an isothermal CSTR using integrated EPC and SPC

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the integration of Engineering Process Control (EPC) and Statistical Process Control (SPC) for the control of product concentration of an isothermal CSTR. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the performance of Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N), Direct Synthesis, (DS) and Internal Model Control (IMC) tuning methods and determine the most effective method for this process. The simulation model was obtained from past literature and re-constructed using SIMULINK MATLAB to evaluate the process response. Additionally, the process stability, capability and normality were analyzed using Process Capability Sixpack reports in Minitab. Based on the results, DS displays the best response for having the smallest rise time, settling time, overshoot, undershoot, Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) and Integral Square Error (ISE). Also, based on statistical analysis, DS yields as the best tuning method as it exhibits the highest process stability and capability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roslan, A. H., Abd Karim, S. F., & Hamzah, N. (2018). Performance analysis of different tuning rules for an isothermal CSTR using integrated EPC and SPC. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 334). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free