Commonalities and contrasts in recent guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection

Abstract

Updates to guidelines covering lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection have recently been published by the International Society on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (ISTH) and British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH), in 2009 and 2012, respectively. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) published its first LA guideline in 2014. Cross-panel agreement exists on sample manipulation, use of dRVVT analysis, conversion of clotting times to ratios, calculations to demonstrate phospholipid dependence, mixing test interpretation and provision of interpretive reporting. Whilst ISTH restricts assay choice to just dRVVT and activated partial thromboplastin time, BCSH and CLSI consider the case for additional tests. All panels acknowledge the potential for false-negative mixing tests, yet they remain mandated by ISTH and BCSH, the latter, however, indicating that a negative mixing test need not exclude a LA if testing on undiluted plasma is unequivocal. CLSI reprioritizes test order to screen-confirm-mix to reduce false-negative reporting when antibodies are diluted to undetectable levels in mixing tests. Recommendations differ on how to derive cut-off levels, particularly in view of the realities of relatively low donor numbers. Each guideline considers testing of anticoagulated patients, BCSH and CLSI endorsing Taipan snake venom time as a useful supplementary assay in patients on vitamin K antagonists. Although full consensus is not apparent, these publications represent significant moves towards engendering common practices. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.