Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations with atypia of undetermined significance

104Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The diagnostic category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in the Bethesda System for reporting the results of thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) is intended to encompass findings associated with a low risk of malignancy. It is unclear if there are patterns within this evolving, heterogeneous category associated with differing risk of malignancy that might warrant alternative classification or clinical management. Therefore, a retrospective review of 512 AUS FNAs from January 2005 to May 2009 was done. Most malignancies associated with AUS were papillary carcinoma (86/96 [90%]), of which 85% (73/86) were follicular variants. Atypia qualifiers were correlated with the follow-up rate of malignancy. The risk of malignancy for architectural atypia alone was approximately half that observed for cytologic, both cytologic and architectural, or unspecified atypia. Architectural atypia alone was less likely to be papillary carcinoma and more likely to be follicular adenoma. The lower risk of malignancy associated with isolated architectural atypia compared with other patterns of AUS should be considered in clinical decision making and in future management guidelines. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

VanderLaan, P. A., Marqusee, E., & Krane, J. F. (2011). Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations with atypia of undetermined significance. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 136(4), 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPO0BQ2YSKPXXP

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free