Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks

377Citations
Citations of this article
257Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Individuals with similar political orientations may find themselves in dissimilar social and political surroundings, with important consequences for the flow of political information among citizens. Analyses of data from the post-election survey of the 2000 National Election Study show that some individuals reside within extensive networks of political discussion and communication, whereas others are politically isolated. With respect to presidential candidate preference in 2000, some citizens in networks were surrounded by discussants who agreed with their preference, others by discussants who held ambiguous and undetermined preferences, and still others by discussants who held politically divergent preferences. These preference distributions have various implications for the formation of political opinion and for levels of political engagement and turnout.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004, February). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free