Background: The complex etiology of child growth failure and anemia—commonly used indicators of child under-nutrition—involving proximate and distal risk factors at multiple levels is generally recognized. However, their independent and joint effects are often assessed with no clear conceptualization of inferential targets. Methods: We utilized hierarchical linear modeling and a nationally representative sample of 139,116 children aged 6–59 months from India (2015–2016) to estimate the extent to which a comprehensive set of 27 covariates explained the within-and between-population variation in height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-height, and hemoglobin level. Results: Most of the variation in child anthropometry and hemoglobin measures was attributable to within-population differences (80–85%), whereas between-population differences (including communities, districts, and states) accounted for only 15–20%. The proximate and distal covariates explained 0.2–7.5% of within-population variation and 2.1–34.0% of between-population variation, depending on the indicator of interest. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the magnitude of within-population variation, and the fraction explained, in child anthropometry and hemoglobin measures across the 36 states/union territories of India. Conclusions: Policies and interventions aimed at reducing between-population inequalities in child undernutrition may require a different set of components than those concerned with within-population inequalities. Both are needed to promote the health of the general population, as well as that of high-risk children.
CITATION STYLE
Rodgers, J., Kim, R., & Subramanian, S. V. (2020). Explaining within-vs between-population variation in child anthropometry and hemoglobin measures in India: A multilevel analysis of the national family health survey 2015–2016. Journal of Epidemiology, 30(11), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20190064
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.