What the ‘greater good’ excludes: Patients left behind by pre-operative COVID-19 screening in an Ethiopian town

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, bioethical analyses often emphasized population health and societal benefit. Hospital policies frequently focused on reducing risk of transmitting SARS-CoV-2 by restricting visitors; requiring protective equipment; and screening staff, patients and visitors. While restrictions can be burdensome, they are often justified as essential measures to protect the whole population against a virus with high rates of transmission, morbidity and mortality. Yet communities are not monolithic, and the impacts of these restrictions affect different groups differently. An ophthalmological unit outreach program in Ethiopia serves to illustrate. Pre-operative screening policies were designed to protect as many patients as possible but had adverse impacts on underserved communities. As this case study demonstrates, creating hospital policies that truly serve the good of the society may require a more holistic review of impacts on inequitably positioned communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campelia, G. D., Suga, H. K., Kempen, J. H., Kirkpatrick, J. N., & Jecker, N. S. (2023). What the ‘greater good’ excludes: Patients left behind by pre-operative COVID-19 screening in an Ethiopian town. Developing World Bioethics, 23(3), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free