Ecophysiology of drill-seeded rice under reduced nitrogen fertilizer and reduced irrigation during El Niño in Central Colombia

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Improvement of efficiencies of N fertilizer and irrigation water is needed for large-scale market-oriented rice cultivation without puddling practice as in American continents. Effects of reductions of N fertilizer and irrigation water on grain yield of drill-seeded rice on zero-leveled fields were quantified across five N levels (220, 180 [two sources with 5 or 3 splits], 140, and 0 kg N ha−1) and three irrigation strategies (irrigating every 3, 6, or 8 days; W1, W2, and W3, respectively) in dry and wet seasons during an El Niño event in Central Colombia. Reducing the N application rate from 180 kg N ha−1 to 140 kg N ha−1 (22% reduction) did not reduce yield in either season in spite of slightly reduced N uptake, owing to increased N use efficiency in all irrigation strategies. Three split of N fertilizer with slow release urea (180 kg N ha−1) and with basal organic amendment did not reduce yield compared with the conventional 5 split method. Yield in dry season reduced under the 2 water-saving strategies (W2, W3) almost proportionally to the reduced water supply (irrigation + rainfall) by flowering. In wet season, yield in mild water saving (W2, with 26% water saving) was similar to conventional irrigation management (W1), leading to its highest water productivity. Physiological parameters (e.g. stomatal conductance, total N uptake) were greater in wet season than in dry season. This study showed potential reduction of N fertilizer and conditions of climate for water-saving in drill-seeded rice production in Colombia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deshmukh, V., Kamoshita, A., Lopez-Galvis, L., & Pineda, D. (2021). Ecophysiology of drill-seeded rice under reduced nitrogen fertilizer and reduced irrigation during El Niño in Central Colombia. Plant Production Science, 24(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2021.1881407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free