Abstract
Geopolymers, being inorganic polymers created from rock sources, were evaluated as an alternative to Portland cement. To evaluate their usability, some properties of a selected geopolymer were measured and compared with those from a neat class G Portland cement. The geopolymeric slurries showed a non-Newtonian viscosity behavior with a measurable, albeit low, yield stress. The pumpability measurements using atmospheric and pressurized consistometer showed an adequate set profile for both the geopolymer and cement sample. Static fluid loss test shows that the geopolymeric slurries experienced a lower fluid loss compared to that of the Portland cement. The shrinkage factor for the geopolymers was reduced (expanded) as the downhole temperature was ramped up. The shrinkage of the Portland cement sample proceeded only with a lower rate. Tensile strength of the geopolymers was approximately 5% of their compressive strength; however, this value for Portland cement was approximately 10% of its compressive strength. Finally, shear bond strength of geopolymers would benefit from improvement.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Khalifeh, M., Saasen, A., Hodne, H., Godøy, R., & Vrålstad, T. (2018). Geopolymers as an alternative for oil well cementing applications: A review of advantages and concerns. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040192
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.