Comparison of soft cervical collar versus cervical-5 cross-taping on cervical active range of motion in asymptomatic subjects

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] The objective of this study was to compare the active cervical range of motion (CROM) of asymptomatic subjects without orthosis with wearing cervical soft collars or with cervical 5cross-taping. [Subjects] Twenty-three asymptomatic subjects (13 males, 10 females) without neck or shoulder pain agreed to participate in this study. [Methods] The active neck movement (flexion, extension, and left and right rotation and lateral flexion) of the subjects was measured using a CROM instrument without orthosis, while wearing a cervical soft collar, and with cervical-5 cross-taping. [Results] All active neck movements with cervical-5 cross-taping were significantly reduced compared to without orthosis. All active neck movements while wearing soft cervical collars were significantly reduced compared to without orthosis and cervical-5 cross-taping. [Conclusion] These preliminary results suggest that cervical-5 cross-taping using Kinesio tape may allow more active neck movement than soft cervical collars and be more supported than without orthosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. H., Lee, K. S., Koo, H. M., & Han, J. T. (2012). Comparison of soft cervical collar versus cervical-5 cross-taping on cervical active range of motion in asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(2), 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free