Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of 64Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST2), we characterized a series of 64Cu-labeled [Tyr3]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST2 binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST2 and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ullrich, M., Brandt, F., Löser, R., Pietzsch, J., & Wodtke, R. (2023). Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of 64Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells. ACS Omega, 8(26), 24003–24009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02755

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free