Influence of physical and radiobiological models on evaluation of radiotherapy treatment fractionation schedules for GBM brain tumours

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the radiotherapy planning performance considering the clinical results of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)-treated patients from both physical and radiobiological perspectives. Radiotherapy plans are done for 20 patients with GBM tumors who have received radical VMAT treatment on Eclipse-13.5. Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation metrics are estimated to compare the two plans in terms of TCP, NTCP, and P+ in the context of the evaluated physical metrics. Both conventional and hypofractionation give better dose homogeneity and conformity to the tumour. In addition, hypofractionation schedule coverage targets cells with radiation doses higher than conventional schemes. However, both schedules are at acceptable and safe levels. Statistically, the calculated metrics showed good significance between conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules. The results have led to the safe use of hypofractionated radiotherapy that can be extended for different tumours, which helps in breaking down the waiting list of patients in many hospitals, especially in cases of pandemics such as COVID-19.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seyam, E. A., El-Sayed, S. M., Amin, A. E., El-Farrash, A. H., & Sallah, M. (2023). Influence of physical and radiobiological models on evaluation of radiotherapy treatment fractionation schedules for GBM brain tumours. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2023.2228020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free