Validation and interpretation of machine-learning models for rapid identification of active tuberculosis infection using routine laboratory indicators

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection relies on clinical symptoms, imaging, and molecular testing, but these methods are often costly and slow. Consequently, there is an urgent need for a rapid and accessible diagnostic approach that can support early detection and reduce ongoing tuberculosis transmission. Methods: A discovery cohort of 3,829 individuals and an external validation cohort of 405 individuals were included. Six supervised machine learning models were trained using routine laboratory data, and model interpretability was assessed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Among the six models, XGBoost demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in the internal cohort (accuracy 97.49%; sensitivity 97.56%; specificity 97.42%) and maintained strong performance in the external cohort (accuracy 93.67%; sensitivity 91.56%; specificity 91.13%). SHAP analysis indicated that key predictors reflected characteristic host-response patterns, including inflammation-related hypoalbuminemia, lipid metabolism suppression (HDL-C and LDL-C), altered platelet activity (MPV), and lymphocyte reduction (LYM). Conclusion: The study presents a high-performing and interpretable machine learning model capable of accurately identifying active Mtb infection using routine blood tests. This low-cost and non-invasive approach has strong potential for application in resource-limited and high-burden settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Z. Z., Yuan, Q., Zhang, Y. D., Zhang, X. D., Liu, J., Yan, J. W., … Wang, L. (2025). Validation and interpretation of machine-learning models for rapid identification of active tuberculosis infection using routine laboratory indicators. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1718614

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free