Landlocked countries, natural resources and growth: The double economic curse hypothesis

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the hypothesis of a double effect of economic slowdown on economic growth, resulting by the income of natural resources and being a landlocked country. We considered the problem of heterogeneity as conditioned functions to quantile moments in response of economic growth. To do this, groups of 97 countries are considered for the period 1970-2014. The results suggest that the “double economic curse” presents an annual impact of-3% in quantiles of medium-low growth countries. Subsequently, additive effects between human capital and trade openness are evaluated to mitigate the lag impacts on growth: Decreasing approximately between 20% and 40% of the negative effect for low growth countries and contracting around 10% and 50% for countries with medium growth rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rivero, R. A. B., Ramírez, M. A. N., Vargas, J. S., Caba, L. F. E., & Del Río, S. V. (2019). Landlocked countries, natural resources and growth: The double economic curse hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free