Midazolam versus hydroxyzine as intramuscular premedicant

25Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study was carried out in which the effects of midazolam (0.08 mg · kg-1) and hydroxyzine (1.5 mg · kg-1), with or without atropine (0.4 mg) or hyoscine (0.4 mg) were compared as intramuscular premedicants. Midazolam produced quicker onset of action, greater anxiolysis for the first hour, greater amnesia, less local irritation and a higher overall rating by the patients. Drowsiness, while also greater after midazolam, was neither marked nor prolonged. Both drugs were given similar overall ratings by the anaesthetists who administered the anaesthetics. Neither drug produced systemic toxicity. Of the two drugs known to produce amnesia, midazolam had amore profound effect and had an earlier onset than hyoscine. Midazolam (0.08 mg · kg-1) shows good potential as an intramuscular premedicant, especially when anaesthetic induction occurs 30 to 60 minutes later. Hyoscine, but not atropine, enhances the effects of the sedative drugs. © 1983 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fragen, R. J., Funk, D. I., Avram, M. J., Costello, C., & DeBruine, K. (1983). Midazolam versus hydroxyzine as intramuscular premedicant. Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal, 30(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009342

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free