To evaluate the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) for evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

16Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) for detection of uterine cavity abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) taking hysteroscopy as the gold standard. Methods: This was a prospective study done in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary care academic hospital. Sixty premenopausal and postmenopausal women who presented with AUB underwent TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy. The presence of focal abnormality and the type of abnormality, i.e., polyp, submucous myoma, and endometrial hyperplasia, were noted. The results of TVS and SIS were compared with hysteroscopy. Results: On hysteroscopy, 76.67 % (n = 46) patients were diagnosed with intra cavity abnormalities. SIS showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 89.1, 100, 100, and 73.7 %, respectively. In comparison, TVS showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 43.48, 78.57, 86.96, and 29.73 %, respectively. Conclusions: SIS was found to be more sensitive and specific than TVS in detection of intra cavity abnormalities. © 2014 Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chawla, I., Tripathi, S., Vohra, P., & Singh, P. (2014). To evaluate the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) for evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 64(3), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0501-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free