Defining the word

29Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, I propose a definition of the term word that can be applied to all languages using the same criteria. Roughly, a word is defined as a free morph or a clitic or a root plus affixes or a compound plus affixes. The paper relies on earlier definitions of the terms free, morph, affix, clitic, root, and compound, which are summarized here. I briefly compare the proposed definition with Bloomfield’s, I note that it is a shared-core definition, and I say how word-forms differ from lexemes. In the final section, I explain why I think that an unnatural-seeming definition is better than a prototype definition or other options.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haspelmath, M. (2023). Defining the word. Word, 69(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2023.2237272

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free