Thucydides and just war: How to begin to Read Walzer's just and unjust wars

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Thucydides is usually considered a realist thinker who denies a meaningful place to right or justice in international relations. In Just and Unjust Wars, however, Michael Walzer develops a powerful critique of realism through an engagement with Thucydides. This article compares Walzer's treatment with Leo Strauss's anti-realist interpretation of Thucydides, suggesting many similarities between Walzer's approach and Strauss's. Both Walzer and Strauss hold that, even in war, necessity does not eliminate meaningful margins of moral choice. Strauss's much more expansive treatment of Thucydides helps us appreciate the subtleties of Walzer's terse argument against realists. © The Author, 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EJIL Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howse, R. (2013). Thucydides and just war: How to begin to Read Walzer’s just and unjust wars. European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free