ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise (PLoS ONE (2017) 12: 7 (e0179722) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722)

PLoS ONE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190337
3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the Methods section, there is an error in the fourth equation in the subsection titled “‘Example of the calculation”. Please view the complete, correct equation here: (265:09 14639:38) +(395:51*3659:84) = £5328256:5 [£5328295 approx.].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK’s national research assessment exercise (PLoS ONE (2017) 12: 7 (e0179722) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722). (2017, December 1). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free