Calibrating a proportional hazards model with time-correlated covariates: a case study in probability of default modelling for credit risk analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Proportional Hazards Models with an exponential duration model encounter a parameter identification problem in case one or more time-dependent covariates are correlated with the time component of the duration formula. Conventional approaches to modelling time-dependent covariates no longer apply, and a new framework is required. A case study is considered from the field of credit risk modelling to propose a framework that solves the parameter identification problem. Specifically, the effect of credit maturities on the default behaviour of a loan portfolio are often not analysed thoroughly, nor is this a regulatory requirement. However, in most portfolios, there can exist a strong negative correlation between the maturity of a loan and the creditworthiness of the customer. This may lead to spurious conclusions when analysing the default behaviour of the portfolio. In this paper, an example–a selected wholesale Low-Default Portfolio (LDP) at ING–of such a correlation is presented and how this impacts the calculation of a Long-Run Average Default Rate (LRADR) estimate, which is used for calibrating regulatory Probability of Default (PD) estimates. A rigorous mathematical framework based on a proportional hazard rate model, where time is correlated with the scale component of the baseline hazard, is introduced to simulate default patterns comparable to the real-world LDP, which also explains how to parametrise such patterns. Finally, several estimation methods for the LRADR estimate given a correlated time component with a credit ranking function are provided and evaluated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oeyen, B., & Rallis, T. (2026). Calibrating a proportional hazards model with time-correlated covariates: a case study in probability of default modelling for credit risk analysis. Quantitative Finance, 26(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2025.2601721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free