Animal Ethics, Animal Welfare, and Speciesism: Considerations for Social Work

  • Silberberg P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Social work is a human-centric social science that by design does not traditionally look beyond an anthropocentric perspective of practice, and this has consequences for nonhuman animals. Indeed, certain aspects of social service are oppressive towards nonhuman animals by advocating for the primacy of human rights and self-determination, which in a number of instances actively discriminates against nonhuman species through various forms of exploitation including (but not limited to) factory farming, hunting, entertainment, and ritual slaughter. This paper is a review of the curious relationship that social work has in regards to nonhuman animals in the United States, and how this dynamic can encourage and engender widespread forms of discrimination towards these sentient beings. Animal ethics, animal welfare, and speciesism are examined in the context of social work ethics, principles, and practice. Considerations are proposed and discussed for finding common ground between the NASW Social Work Code of Ethics and animal ethics, with the purpose of allowing for the social work profession to develop a more inclusive value system, one which

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silberberg, P. J. (2023). Animal Ethics, Animal Welfare, and Speciesism: Considerations for Social Work. International Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 20(2), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.55521/10-020-206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free