Regression Algorithms in Predicting the SARS-CoV-2 Replicase Polyprotein 1ab Inhibitor: A Comparative Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Due to its extensive steps and trials, drug discovery is a long and expensive process. In the last decade, as also hard pressed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the screening process could be assisted with the advancement in computational technology including the application of Machine Learning. The classification task in Machine Learning has become one of the major approaches for drug discovery. Unfortunately, this practice uses discretized labels that might lead to the loss of quantitative properties that could be meaningful. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to compare various Machine Learning regression algorithms in predicting inhibitory bioactivity, specifically the IC50 value, with the SARS-CoV-2 Replicase Polyprotein 1ab as the target. With 1,138 non-duplicated data downloaded from the ChEMBL database that was engineered into four dataset variances, 42 regression algorithms were utilized for the prediction. We found that there are computational challenges to the use of regression algorithms in predicting bioactivity, for only a handful and a specific dataset variance that returned valid performance parameters upon testing. The three that yielded the highest counts of valid performance parameters are the Histogram Gradient Boosting Regressor (HGBR), Light Gradient Boosting Machine Regressor (LGBR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Further statistical analyses show that there is no significant difference between these three algorithms, except for the time taken for training and testing the model, where the LGBR excels. Therefore, these three algorithms should be primarily considered for the study with the same nature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sengkey, D. F., & Masengi, A. S. R. (2024). Regression Algorithms in Predicting the SARS-CoV-2 Replicase Polyprotein 1ab Inhibitor: A Comparative Study. Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35882/jeeemi.v6i1.338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free