HATCH score associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The HATCH score, a new atrial fibrillation (AF) risk model, has drawn wide attention. However, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the relationship between the HATCH score and NOAF remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between HATCH score and new-onset AF (NOAF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients. Methods: This single-center retrospective observation consecutively selected patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. All patients received continuous electrocardiogram monitoring during hospitalization (≥ 36 h). HATCH score was calculated based on hypertension (1 point), age > 75 years (1 point), stroke or TIA (2 point), COPD (1 point), and HF (2 point). Results: A total of 774 patients were included in this study, of whom 65.37% were male, with a mean age of 63.53 ± 13.11 years, 73 patients (9.43%) developed NOAF. ROC curve demonstrated that the AUC of the HATCH score was 0.731, the cut - off value was 2.5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the HATCH score (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.41–1.95, P < 0.001) or HATCH score ≥ 3 (OR = 4.10, 95% CI: 2.39–7.02, P < 0.001) was an independent risk predictor for NOAF. The RCS analysis revealed a linear correlation between the HATCH score and NOAF (P for overall < 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated HATCH score is an independent risk factor for the development of NOAF after PCI in STEMI patients. There was a linear dose-response relationship between HATCH score and NOAF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qin, S., Tao, Y., Tang, C., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Fei, Z. (2025). HATCH score associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04989-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free