Surgical Management of Idiopathic Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Perianal fistula is a common colorectal condition with an incidence of 9 per 100,000. Many surgical treatments exist, all aiming to eliminate symptoms with minimal risk of recurrence and impact upon continence. Despite extensive evaluation of the therapeutic modalities, no clear consensus exists as to what is the gold standard approach. This systematic review aimed to examine all available evidence pertaining to the surgical management of perianal fistulas. Primary outcomes examined were recurrence and incontinence. Summary: This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes were analyzed for each group and expressed as pooled odds ratio with confidence intervals of 95%. 687 studies were identified from which 28 relevant studies were included. There was no significant difference in rates of incontinence identified between various surgical approaches. Glues and plugs show higher recurrence rates. Newer treatments continue to emerge with promise but lack supporting evidence of benefit over conventional therapies. Key Messages: While we await more robust randomized data, we will continue to proceed cautiously trying to offset the benefits of fistula healing against the inherent risk of altered continence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheung, X. C., Fahey, T., Rogers, A. C., Pemberton, J. H., & Kavanagh, D. O. (2021, March 1). Surgical Management of Idiopathic Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Digestive Surgery. S. Karger AG. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512652

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free