A cost analysis: General endotracheal versus regional versus monitored anesthesia care

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to compare the total cost of all consumable products used to perform a general endotracheal anesthetic [GETA), a regional anesthetic, and a monitored anesthetic (MAC). For 1 month, providers completed a survey for each anesthetic rendered identifying type and quantity of consumables used. The mean cost of each type of anesthetic was identified. Analysis of variance was conducted using SPSS (version 7.5.1) to compare the mean costs of the three groups. Of 936 anesthetics performed, 536 surveys were returned (57%). The breakdown by type was GETA, 60% (N = 319); regional, 35% (N = 189); and MAC, 5% (N = 28). The mean cost per case type was GETA $61.74; regional, $34.99; and MAC, $26.27. The cost of rendering a GETA was significantly greater (p < 0.0005) than that of either regional or MAC. Clinical practice guidelines were established to address areas in which cost savings could be realized and were provided to all anesthesia practitioners to assist in providing the safest and most cost- effective method of rendering an anesthetic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brooks, D. M., & Hand, W. R. (1999). A cost analysis: General endotracheal versus regional versus monitored anesthesia care. Military Medicine, 164(4), 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/164.4.303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free