Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study

765Citations
Citations of this article
188Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. BACKGROUND: A number of cases of stent thrombosis have been reported after commercial release of the SES in the "real world," such that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning. METHODS: Fifteen patients who developed stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation were analyzed and compared with 45 matched control patients who had no evidence of stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Minimum stent cross-sectional area (MSA) (4.3 ± 1.6 mm2 vs. 6.2 ± 1.9 mm2, p < 0.001) and stent expansion (0.65 ± 0.18 vs. 0.85 ± 0.14, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller in the stent thrombosis group than in the matched control patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of SES malapposition between the groups. However, the presence of a significant residual reference segment stenosis was more common in the stent thrombosis group compared with the matched control group (67% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of stent thrombosis were stent underexpansion (p = 0.03) and a significant residual reference segment stenosis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are associated with stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation. © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujii, K., Carlier, S. G., Mintz, G. S., Yang, Y. M., Moussa, I., Weisz, G., … Leon, M. B. (2005). Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(7), 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free