The Impact of Having a 15-min Break With and Without Consuming an Energy Drink on Prolonged Simulated Highway Driving

  • Verster J
  • van de Loo A
  • Bervoets A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose To examine whether consuming an energy drink while having a break is effective in reducing the number of lapses of attention during prolonged highway driving. Methods In a double-blind crossover study, N = 21 healthy volunteers performed a 4-h driving test in the STISIM driving simulator. After 2 h, a 15-min break was scheduled. During the break, participants consumed either 250 ml of energy drink (ED) (Red Bull) or a placebo drink (Red Bull without caffeine (80 mg), glucuronolactone, taurine and B-vitamins). Participants were instructed to drive 95 km/h with a steady lateral position. Primary outcome was the number (#) of lapses; i.e., short periods of inattention defined by a deviation from the chosen lateral position for > 100 cm for 8 s or more. Results Having a break, without consuming energy drink, significantly reduced the number of lapses in the 3rd hour of driving (9.9 versus 7.4 lapses, p = 0.006). After placebo, the number of lapses in the 4th and 2nd hour were identical (9.9 and 9.9 lapses, p = 1.000). Consuming and energy drink during the break resulted in a significant reduction in lapses in the 3rd hour (4.3 versus 9.2, p = 0.012) and 4th hour of driving (6.2 versus 9.2 lapses, p = 0.041), when compared with the 2nd hour of driving. Conclusion Consuming an energy drink while having a 15-min break significantly reduces the number of lapses during prolonged highway driving, and to a greater extent than having a break only.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verster, J. C., van de Loo, A. J. A. E., Bervoets, A. C., Mooren, L., & Roth, T. (2017). The Impact of Having a 15-min Break With and Without Consuming an Energy Drink on Prolonged Simulated Highway Driving. Sleep and Vigilance, 1(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41782-017-0019-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free