Perioperative effects of oral ketorolac and acetaminophen in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy

170Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prophylactic administration of analgesics before surgery can decrease the intraoperative anaesthetic requirement and decrease pain during the early postoperative period. In a doubleblind, placebocontrolled study involving 90 healthy ASA physical status I or II children undergoing bilateral myringotomy, we compared the postoperative analgesic effects of oral acetaminophen and ketorolac, when administered 30 min before induction of anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive saline (0.1 ml · kg-1), acetaminophen (10 mg · kg-1) or ketorolac (1 mg · kg-1) diluted in cherry syrup to a total volume of 5 ml. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide via a face mask. Postoperative pain was assessed by a blinded observer using an objective pain scale. The three study groups were similar with respect to demographic data, duration of anaesthesia and surgery, induction behaviour, oxygen saturation, incidence of postoperative emesis and, recovery times. The ketorolac group had lower postoperative pain scores and required less frequent analgesic therapy in the early postoperative period compared with the acetaminophen and placebo groups. In contrast, there were no differences in pain scores or analgesic requirements between the acetaminophen and the placebo groups. We conclude that the preoperative administration of oral ketorolac, but not acetaminophen, provided better postoperative pain control than placebo in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy. © 1992 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watcha, M. F., Ramirez-Ruiz, M., White, P. F., Jones, M. B., Lagueruela, R. G., & Terkonda, R. P. (1992). Perioperative effects of oral ketorolac and acetaminophen in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 39(7), 649–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008224

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free