Comparison of treatment outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudophakic primary angle-closure glaucoma receiving maximal medical therapy

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a useful treatment for intraocular pressure (IOP) control. However, there are only a few reports which compare the outcomes of SLT between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). We compared the efficacy of SLT for patients with PACG following phacoemulsification with POAG receiving maximal medical therapy (MMT). Consecutive glaucoma patients followed up for at least 1 year after SLT were retrospectively evaluated and IOP reductions at 6 months and 12 months were analyzed. Seventy-six patients were included in the analyses. The baseline IOPs in the POAG and PACG group were 18.5 ± 3.3 mmHg and 16.9 ± 2.5 mmHg, respectively, with 2.8 ± 0.9 and 2.7 ± 0.8 types of IOP lowering medication. The average IOP at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up after SLT was significantly decreased and comparable in both the POAG and PACG groups. For those with a low baseline IOP, the effect of SLT on IOP reduction at 12 months was significantly better in the PACG than in the POAG group (p = 0.003). IOP reduction at 6 and 12 months after SLT was significantly greater in those with a high baseline IOP than those with a low baseline IOP (p < 0.0065). In summary, the one-year efficacy of SLT was equivalent in POAG and pseudophakic PACG patients receiving MMT; however, SLT was more effective in eyes with PACG than eyes with POAG when focusing on those with a lower baseline IOP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, P. Y., Wang, J. Y., Wang, J. K., Huang, T. L., & Hsu, Y. R. (2021). Comparison of treatment outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudophakic primary angle-closure glaucoma receiving maximal medical therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free