Experience overrides personality differences in the tendency to follow but not in the tendency to lead

32Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In many animal groups, coordinated activity is facilitated by the emergence of leaders and followers. Although the identity of leaders is to some extent predictable, most groups experience frequent changes of leadership. How do group members cope with such changes in their social role? Here, we compared the foraging behaviour of pairs of stickleback fish after a period of either (i) role reinforcement, which involved rewarding the shyer follower for following, and the bolder leader for leading, or (ii) role reversal, which involved rewarding the shyer follower for leading, and the bolder leader for following. We found that, irrespective of an individual's temperament, its tendency to follow is malleable, whereas the tendency to initiate collective movement is much more resistant to change. As a consequence of this lack of flexibility in initiative, greater temperamental differences within a pair led to improved performance when typical roles were reinforced, but to impaired performance when typical roles were reversed. © 2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakayama, S., Stumpe, M. C., Manica, A., & Johnstone, R. A. (2013). Experience overrides personality differences in the tendency to follow but not in the tendency to lead. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1769). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1724

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free