Emergency versus elective living-donor liver transplantation: A comparison of a single center analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose We studied the risk factors for postoperative mortality between patients who underwent emergency or elective living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods Forty-seven patients underwent LDLT in our institute, 16 for emergencies and 31 as elective procedures. The emergency LDLT status was applied to cases in which the time period between referral to our institution and transplantation did not exceed 10 days, and in which liver failure was accompanied by the presence of any degree of hepatic encephalopathy. Results With regard to preoperative factors, age (P = 0.03), the model for end-stage liver disease score (P = 0.001), preoperative tracheal intubation (P = 0.001), ratio between arterial oxygen tension and fractional inspired oxygen (PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio) (P = 0.03), steroid therapy use (P = 0.001), lymphocyte count (P = 0.02), and cases requiring hemodiafiltration (P = 0.001) differed significantly between the two groups. Postoperative pneumonia occurred more frequently in emergency LDLT patients than in elective LDLT patients (P = 0.006). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was the main cause of postoperative death in emergency LDLT patients, and, in a univariate analysis, a preoperative status of high serum (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (>20 pg/ml, P = 0.001), advanced age (<52 years, P = 0.02), and a low PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio (<320, P = 0.01) were identified as factors predictive of IPA. Conclusion Careful perioperative management, including preoperative investigation of aspergillosis and empiric antibiotic therapy, should be considered for emergency LDLT patients who fulfill IPA risk factors. © Springer 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takeda, K., Tanaka, K., Kumamoto, T., Nojiri, K., Mori, R., Taniguchi, K., … Endo, I. (2012). Emergency versus elective living-donor liver transplantation: A comparison of a single center analysis. Surgery Today, 42(5), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0040-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free