Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between exposure to adverse psychosocial working conditions and poor self-rated health among bank employees. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including a sample of 2,054 employees of a government bank was conducted in 2008. Self-rated health was assessed by a single question: "In general, would you say your health is (. . .)." Exposure to adverse psychosocial working conditions was evaluated by the effortreward imbalance model and the demand-control model. Information on other independent variables was obtained through a self-administered semistructured questionnaire. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and odds ratio calculated to assess independent associations between adverse psychosocial working conditions and poor self-rated health. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of poor self-rated health was 9%, with no signifi cant gender difference. Exposure to high demand and low control environment at work was associated with poor self-rated health. Employees with high effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment also reported poor self-rated health, with a dose-response relationship. Social support at work was inversely related to poor self-rated health, with a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to adverse psychosocial work factors assessed based on the effort-reward imbalance model and the demand-control model is independently associated with poor self-rated health among the workers studied.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Silva, L. S., & Barreto, S. M. (2012). Stressful working conditions and poor self-rated health among fi nancial services employees. Revista de Saude Publica, 46(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012005000023
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.