Science and engineering Ph.D. students' career outcomes, by gender

25Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examine differences in the careers of men and women Ph.D.s from two major European universities. Having performed regression analysis, we find that women are more likely than men to be employed in public administration when the alternatives are either academia or industry. Between the latter two alternatives, women are more likely to be employed in academia. These gender differences persist after accounting for Ph.D.s' and their supervisors' characteristics. Gender gaps are smaller for Ph.D.s with large research outputs and for those who conducted applied research. Restricting the analysis to Ph.D.s who pursued postdoc training, women are less likely than men to be employed in highly ranked universities, even after controlling for their research outputs. Finally, we find gender differences in Ph.D.s' appointment to professorship, which are explained by the Ph.D.s' publication output and the quality of their postdoc training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conti, A., & Visentin, F. (2015). Science and engineering Ph.D. students’ career outcomes, by gender. PLoS ONE, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free