Quality issues in georeferencing: From physical collections to digital data repositories for ecological research

20Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Natural history collections constitute an enormous wealth of information of Life on Earth. It is estimated that over 2 billion specimens are preserved at institutions worldwide, of which less than 10% are accessible via biodiversity data aggregators such as GBIF. Moreover, they are a very important resource for eco-evolutionary research, which greatly depends on knowing the precise location where the specimens were collected in order to characterize the environment in which they lived. Yet, only about 55% of the accessible records are georeferenced and only 31% have coordinate uncertainty information, which is critical for conducting rigorous studies. The awareness of this gap of knowledge which hinders the enormous potential of such data in research led to the organization of a workshop which brought together key players in georeferencing of natural history collections. The discussion and outcomes of this workshop are here presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcer, A., Haston, E., Groom, Q., Ariño, A. H., Chapman, A. D., Bakken, T., … Wieczorek, J. R. (2021, March 1). Quality issues in georeferencing: From physical collections to digital data repositories for ecological research. Diversity and Distributions. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free