The reinterpretation of the visibility and quality of new policies to assess scientific publications

32Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study analyzes the development of Latin American scientific publications from 1980 to present day in the context of the scientific assessment policies during that period. The analysis leads to the proposal of three eras in the development of Latin American scientific journals, which are analyzed in relation to the creation of regional systems such as Latindex, SciELO, and RedALyC. In the context of the third period -“internationalization”-the new journal evaluation policies of Mexico and Colombia (2016) are further analyzed and inconsistencies with the objectives of the previous periods are identified. In particular, the document analysis highlights how these policies shift the discourse and approach away from those seeking visibility and quality and towards citation as the only valued measure of publications. This change in approach is discussed along with the perceived advances and setbacks from the previous periods. The authors conclude that the scientific community would do well to return to the principles and values established in the first two periods where science and scientific publications were moving towards a regional and cooperative model under the governance of the scientific community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alperin, J. P., & Rozemblum, C. (2017). The reinterpretation of the visibility and quality of new policies to assess scientific publications. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, 40(3), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v40n3a04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free