Fanaticism as a Worldview

  • Chouraqui F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article argues in favour of a formal definition of fanaticism as a certain relationship to one's beliefs that is informed by the assumption that there is a mutual incompatibility between consistency and moderation. It analyses this assumption as an expression of an implicit commitment to naïve realism. It then proposes a critique of such realism and finally it sketches an ontological alternative, able to philosophically and politically respond to and oppose fanaticism by showing the compossibility, on that ontological view, of moderation and consistency. Abstract: This article argues in favour of a formal definition of fanaticism as a certain relationship to one's beliefs that is informed by the assumption that there is a mutual incompatibility between consistency and moderation. It analyses this assumption as an expression of an implicit commitment to naïve realism. It then proposes a critique of such realism and finally it sketches an ontological alternative, able to philosophically and politically respond to and oppose fanaticism by showing the compossibility, on that ontological view, of moderation and consistency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chouraqui, F. (2019). Fanaticism as a Worldview. Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20193.1.192002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free