Fiberoptic Intubation vs. Video-Assisted Fiberoptic Intubation in a High-Fidelity Pediatric Simulator: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Life-threatening hypoxemia during tracheal intubation is more likely to occur in children than adults due to its unique physiological and anatomical nature. Fiberoptic intubation is widely performed in children with difficult airways. However, mastery of fiberoptic intubation requires substantial training, and novice trainees need to attempt fiberoptic intubation in children at high risk of respiratory-related adverse events. Therefore, a safer method than traditional fiberoptic intubation for children with difficult airways is desirable for novice anesthesia trainees. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of video-assisted fiberoptic intubation (VAFI) with that of traditional fiberoptic intubation (FOI) in a high-fidelity pediatric simulator by medical professionals with no experience in tracheal intubation., METHOD: This randomized, controlled, simulation-based study was conducted in a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. Registered nurses working in the operating room were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to either the FOI or VAFI groups. Participants in the FOI group performed fiberoptic intubation without the aid of any device, whereas those in the VAFI group used a video laryngoscope to obtain a better glottic view. The primary outcome was the time from the moment the tip of the flexible bronchoscope passed between the upper and lower incisors until the completion of tracheal intubation., RESULTS: A total of 28 participants were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in the time until the completion of tracheal intubation between FOI and VAFI, with a median time of 55.0 seconds for FOI and 42.5 seconds for VAFI (P = 0.22). Secondary outcomes, including time until passing the vocal cord, the number of intubation attempts, and the first success rate, did not also illustrate the significant difference between the groups., CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate the superiority of VAFI over conventional FOI in a high-fidelity pediatric simulator by medical providers with no experience in tracheal intubation. Copyright © 2023, Isogai et al.