Comparative clinical efficacy of bepridil, propranolol and placebo in patients with chronic stable angina.

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A randomised double‐blind parallel group study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy of bepridil, a new calcium slow channel blocker, with that of propranolol and placebo in patients with chronic stable angina of effort. Efficacy was assessed objectively by dynamic exercise testing using an upright bicycle ergometer and subjectively by patient documentation of anginal frequency and nitrate consumption. The administration of bepridil resulted in a significant improvement in physical work capacity expressed as calculated maximal oxygen uptake (Vo2 max) and exercise time. This was associated with subjective improvement in terms of reduced anginal frequency. Despite baseline differences in exercise performance and anginal frequency between the three treatment groups, the beneficial effects of bepridil were statistically significant when compared to propranolol. Although minor electrocardiographic changes were noted, no adverse effects were evident when bepridil was prescribed in doses of up to 400 mg/day over a 10 week period. 1985 The British Pharmacological Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rae, A., Beattie, J., Lawrie, T., & Hutton, I. (1985). Comparative clinical efficacy of bepridil, propranolol and placebo in patients with chronic stable angina. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 19(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb02653.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free