Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS Are Changing Historical Scholarship

  • Cole D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
205Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How do we relate to the past? Does it tell us who we are? Is it a source of examples to follow and mistakes to avoid? Or can we go beyond that to something genuinely historical? Arthur Chapman and Jane Facey argue that as history teachers we have a responsibility to instil in our students a sense of historical consciousness which enables them to locate themselves in relation to the past in a rigorously historical way. They show that our students' (and our own) concepts of the present are shaped by their concepts of the past This leads to an identity expressed in terms of the history of a particular place. By studying a broader range of historical topics than allowed by the traditional post-16 curriculum, they hope to allow their students to access a broader identity than merely 'British' or 'European' - a necessary measure in our increasingly globalised society. Finally, they propose two innovative and successful courses for post-16 history students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cole, D. G. (2009). Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS Are Changing Historical Scholarship. Cartographic Perspectives, (63), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.14714/cp63.160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free