The Comparison of Four Different Treatment Modalities in Bulky Stage Ib ve IIa Cervix Cancers

  • Ertas I
  • Dogan A
  • Solmaz U
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of four different treatment modalities in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ib2 and IIa2 bulky cervix cancers. Material and method: Totally, n = 70 eligible women with bulky (≤4 cm) FIGO Ib2 - IIa2 cervical cancer diagnosed and treated at our clinic between the years of 1/1994 - 1/2010 were investigated retrospectively. Data regarding demographic and disease related characteristics were obtained for analysis from patients' files. Different treatment modalities (radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (RH + CTRT); primary chemoradiotherapy (CTRT); neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (NACT + RH) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (NACRT + RH) were compared in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier test. A p value of less than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ertas, I. E., Dogan, A., Solmaz, U., Emirdar, V., Ozdemir, A., & Yildirim, Y. (2013). The Comparison of Four Different Treatment Modalities in Bulky Stage Ib ve IIa Cervix Cancers. Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 10(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjod.2013.70973

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free