Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The study compared the cut-to-length (CTL) and the whole-tree-harvesting (WTH) methods under two alternative log length specifications (2 m vs. 4 m) as deployed in the new medium-rotation poplar plantations. The goal of this study was to determine if any of the four combinations of harvesting method and log length incurred lower cost and/or better log yield than the others. The test was conducted in a 6-year-old plantation with a stocking between 30 and 60 bone-dry tons (BDT) per hectare. Each treatment was repeated 8 times–each repetition consisting of one sample plot with a 700 m2 surface area (115–130 trees). Researchers determined the mass obtained from each sample plot, as well as the time necessary to turn standing trees into logs and biomass piled at the landing. A calculator was developed for estimating harvesting costs as a function of variable machine rates. Under the conditions of the study, CTL harvesting into 4-m long logs was the most effective solution, because it offered a better log yield compared with WTH (60% vs. 50%) and incurred the same harvesting cost (∼ 33 € BDT−1). Shortening log length to 2 m determined a 25% increase of harvesting cost.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N., Kovacs, B., Heger, P., & Mihelic, M. (2023). Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 38(1–2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2023.2177336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free