A comparative experimental analysis of channel access protocols in vehicular networks

Abstract

The deployment of vehicular networks is considered crucial for traffic safety of future vehicles. Thus, researchers are making extensive efforts to improve the performance of the IEEE802.11p standard. Many researchers have proposed various MAC protocols to mitigate the chronicle problems of the IEEE802.11p - for example, the unreliable transmission of safety-related messages. However, most of the previous evaluations of the reliability problem have been done either via mathematical analysis or simulations. In this paper, we conducted actual experiments and analyzed the performance of two MAC protocols: IEEE802.11p and HCMAC, a hybrid MAC protocol recently reported. Using commercial V2X devices, we measured the performance in terms of received signal strength indicator (RSSI), packet delivery ratio (PDR), and packet inter-reception time (PIR). We tested the connectivity performance under various mobility scenarios. In addition, this paper investigates the impact of collisions on the overall performance. For a range of collision levels, an extensive set of experiments demonstrate that HCMAC outperforms the MAC of IEEE802.11p in terms of PDR and PIR up to 88% and 47%, respectively.