Comparison of shaking extraction and reflux extraction for the determination of PCDDs, PCDFs and coplanar PCBs in vegetables

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two different extraction methods involving shaking extraction and reflux extraction were examined for the determination of PCDD/Fs and Co-PCBs in vegetables. The two sets of vegetables were extracted by shaking with acetone/hexane and reflux with toluene, followed by a cleanup step. Then, determination of PCDD/Fs and Co-PCBs was carried out by HRGC/HRMS. From three individual experiments, total concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs and Co-PCBs in a spinach sample were 0.48±0.04, 0.80±0.06 and 7.7±0.1 pg/g by shaking extraction, and 0.43±0.08, 0.72±0.05 and 7.3±0.7 pg/g by reflux extraction. In a chingentsuai sample, total concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs and Co-PCBs were 0.67±0.19, 0.50±s0.08 and 2.6±0.6 pg/g by shaking extraction, and 0.81±0.17, 0.64±0.13 and 2.6±0.6 pg/g by reflux extraction. No significant difference in total concentrations was observed between the two extraction methods. Moreover, total TEQ concentrations in the two vegetables showed almost the same values. Our results indicate that these extraction methods are equally efficient for extracting PCDD/Fs and Co-PCBs from vegetables.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toyoda, M., Tsutsumi, T., Yanagi, T., Kono, Y., Uchibe, H., Hori, T., & Iida, T. (2000). Comparison of shaking extraction and reflux extraction for the determination of PCDDs, PCDFs and coplanar PCBs in vegetables. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, 41(5), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.41.316

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free