Is there a need to continue anticoagulation following "Successful" atrial fibrillation ablation?

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. There has been increasing interest in ablation therapy to treat atrial fibrillation. One reason some patients undergo AF ablation might be to obviate the need for warfarin therapy, although current guidelines do not support this rationale. The current review shows that it is difficult to define a true " cure" postablation, as many of these patients will go on to experience future paroxysms of AF (either symptomatic or silent). The mechanism underlying embolism in patients with AF is not completely understood, and no long-term evidence exists that " successfully ablated" patients return to a baseline risk of stroke comparable to an AF-naive population. The authors recommend continued long-term anticoagulation post-AF ablation in patients satisfying CHADS criteria for elevated stroke risk. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levitt, H. L., Toor, S. Z., & Coplan, N. L. (2009). Is there a need to continue anticoagulation following “Successful” atrial fibrillation ablation? Preventive Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7141.2008.00013.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free