BPPV Information on Google Versus AI (ChatGPT)

35Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively compare online patient education materials found using traditional search engines (Google) versus conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) models (ChatGPT) for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Study Design: The top 30 Google search results for “benign paroxysmal positional vertigo” were compared to the OpenAI conversational AI language model, ChatGPT, responses for 5 common patient questions posed about BPPV in February 2023. Metrics included readability, quality, understandability, and actionability. Setting: Online information. Methods: Validated online information metrics including Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), DISCERN instrument score, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printed Materials were analyzed and scored by reviewers. Results: Mean readability scores, FKGL and FRE, for the Google webpages were 10.7 ± 2.6 and 46.5 ± 14.3, respectively. ChatGPT responses had a higher FKGL score of 13.9 ± 2.5 (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellinger, J. R., De La Chapa, J. S., Kwak, M. W., Ramos, G. A., Morrison, D., & Kesser, B. W. (2024). BPPV Information on Google Versus AI (ChatGPT). Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 170(6), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.506

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free