Evaluating the efficiency and safety of speech recognition within a commercial electronic health record system: A replication study

3Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To conduct a replication study to validate previously identified significant risks and inefficiencies associated with the use of speech recognition (SR) for documentation within an electronic health record (EHR) system. Methods Thirty-five emergency department clinicians undertook randomly allocated clinical documentation tasks using keyboard and mouse (KBM) or SR using a commercial EHR system. The experiment design, setting, and tasks (E2) replicated an earlier study (E1), while technical integration issues that may have led to poorer SR performance were addressed. Results Complex tasks were significantly slower to complete using SR (16.94%) than KBM (KBM: 191.9 s, SR: 224.4 s; p = 0.009; CI, 11.9-48.3), replicating task completion times observed in the earlier experiment. Errors (non-typographical) were significantly higher with SR compared with KBM for both simple (KBM: 3, SR: 84; p < 0.001; CI, 1.5- 2.5) and complex tasks (KBM: 23, SR: 53; p = 0.001; CI, 0.5-1.0), again replicating earlier results (E1: 170, E2: 163; p = 0.660; CI, 0.0-0.0). Typographical errors were reduced significantly in the new study (E1: 465, E2: 150; p < 0.001; CI, 2.0-3.0). Discussion The results of this study replicate those reported earlier. The use of SR for clinical documentation within an EHR system appears to be consistently associated with decreased time efficiencies and increased errors. Modifications implemented to optimize SR integration in the EHR seem to have resulted in minor improvements that did not fundamentally change overall results. Conclusion This replication study adds further evidence for the poor performance of SRassisted clinical documentationwithinanEHR.Replication studies remain rare ininformatics literature, especially where study results are unexpected or have significant implication; such studies are clearly needed to avoid overdependence on the results of a single study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hodgson, T., Magrabi, F., & Coiera, E. (2018). Evaluating the efficiency and safety of speech recognition within a commercial electronic health record system: A replication study. Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(2), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649509

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free